Northrope Frye
Herman
Northrop Frye CC FRSC (July
14, 1912 – January 23, 1991) was a Canadian literary critic and literary theorist,
considered one of the most influential of the 20th century.
Frye
gained international fame with his first book, Fearful Symmetry (1947), which led to the
reinterpretation of the poetry of William Blake.
His lasting reputation rests principally on the theory of literary criticism
that he developed in Anatomy of Criticism (1957), one of the most
important works of literary theory published in the twentieth century. The
American critic Harold
Bloom commented at the time of its publication that Anatomy established
Frye as "the foremost living student of Western literature." Frye's
contributions to cultural and social criticism spanned a long career during
which he earned widespread recognition and received many honours.
Thinking activity
1. What is archetypal
criticism ? What does the archetypal critic do ?
In literary criticism the term archetype denotes recurrent narration
design. patterns of action , character- types , themes and images which
are identifiable in a wide variety of work of literature as well as in myths
,dreams and even social rituals. Critic shares the psyche archetypes expressed
by the author such recurrent items are held to be the results of elemental and
universal forms or patterns in the human psyche , whose effective embodiment in
a literary work evokes a profound response from the attentive reader.
2.what
is frye trying to prove by giving an analogy of ' physics to nature ' and
' criticism to literature ' ?
Physics is organized body of knowledge about nature and if student learning
physics , not that he is learning nature.the criticism of literature is
all that can be directly taught , literature is not a ' pure ' or ' exact
science ' so in both term learning and teaching matters become
important.as physics is not nature ,in same manner criticism is not literature
, but it something more than it.
3.
show your views of criticism as an organized body of knowledge , mention
relation of literature with history and philosophy ?
The foreground of criticism is the input of literature on the reader. Knowledge
grows always progressively by use of history , learn form it and growing and
developing . Literature connect with both history and philosophy , both are
most important because it becomes worthy after the use of past and logic ,
history and philosophy.
4.Briefly
explain inductive method with illustration of Shakespeare's Hamlet's
gravedigger ' s scene.
Inductive method move from scientific to general . We can say that
from that scene there is many illustration derived , like Yorick
soliloquy , declaration of Love, Hamlet's struggle with Leartes ,
corruption , blind superstition , loses emotion and at the end universal truth
that all human being are moral. so this illustration from that scene , from
scientific to general.
5.Briefly
explain deductive method with reference to an analogy to music, painting,
rhythm and pattern. Give examples of the outcome of deductive method ?
Deductive method moves from general to scientific . some art move in time ,
like music, and painting. Literature seemed to be intermediate between
music and painting , It's words from rhythms with approach a musical sequence
of sounds at one of its boundaries , and form patterns which approach the
hieroglyphics or pictorial image at the other. Everything in nature that we
think of as having some analogy with works of art. Deductive method
derived thinking process and reasoning like from general to scientific.
In literary criticism the term archetype denotes recurrent narration design. patterns of action , character- types , themes and images which are identifiable in a wide variety of work of literature as well as in myths ,dreams and even social rituals. Critic shares the psyche archetypes expressed by the author such recurrent items are held to be the results of elemental and universal forms or patterns in the human psyche , whose effective embodiment in a literary work evokes a profound response from the attentive reader.
Physics is organized body of knowledge about nature and if student learning physics , not that he is learning nature.the criticism of literature is all that can be directly taught , literature is not a ' pure ' or ' exact science ' so in both term learning and teaching matters become important.as physics is not nature ,in same manner criticism is not literature , but it something more than it.
The foreground of criticism is the input of literature on the reader. Knowledge grows always progressively by use of history , learn form it and growing and developing . Literature connect with both history and philosophy , both are most important because it becomes worthy after the use of past and logic , history and philosophy.
Inductive method move from scientific to general . We can say that from that scene there is many illustration derived , like Yorick soliloquy , declaration of Love, Hamlet's struggle with Leartes , corruption , blind superstition , loses emotion and at the end universal truth that all human being are moral. so this illustration from that scene , from scientific to general.
Deductive method moves from general to scientific . some art move in time , like music, and painting. Literature seemed to be intermediate between music and painting , It's words from rhythms with approach a musical sequence of sounds at one of its boundaries , and form patterns which approach the hieroglyphics or pictorial image at the other. Everything in nature that we think of as having some analogy with works of art. Deductive method derived thinking process and reasoning like from general to scientific.
No comments:
Post a Comment